Initial Response to Bailout Bill

October 7th, 2008

I’m issuing a press release shortly that will be in substantially the following text.

 

PRESS RELEASE – James Bordonaro for Congress- First District of KS.

James Bordonaro, the Democratic candidate for the First District of Kansas issued the following press release concerning the newly passed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.

On Friday, the House of Representatives gave final approval to the Bush Administration’s $700 billion bailout package for Wall Street by passing an even larger Senate version of the bill that the House had rejected only days before that added more than a $100 billion in new tax breaks. 

Jerry Moran, the incumbent Republican Congressman for the First District of Kansas, recently issued a statement to explain his decision to vote against both versions of the bill.  Mr. Bordonaro assailed his explanation and criticized Mr. Moran for not taking steps to address the crisis in the credit markets early on.

Mr. Bordonaro, stated that he has been calling for reforms in the regulation of the financial industry since before the collapse of the investment bank, Bear Stearns, Inc. in March of this year.  He also stated he has long been urging Congress and the Bush Administration to address the underlying problem of a severe downturn in the nation’s housing market triggered by the growing number of home defaults in the subprime mortgage market.  “The root cause of the problem is an overextension of leveraging by many of the nation’s banks and brokerage firms that were heavily invested in so-called ‘collateral debt obligations.’  These are securities whose value is tied to underlying pools of mortgages.”  He went on to explain that because of the growing number of mortgage defaults, financial analysts are having difficulty in determining the value of these derivative instruments on firms’ balance sheets leading other companies to reduce the extension of credit necessary to finance day to day operations. 

Mr. Bordonaro said it was unfortunate that the downturn on Wall Street has spilled over to Main Street but it should not have come as a surprise that the combination of recent events like the collapse of Lehman Brothers and rescue of insurance giant A.I.G. coupled with a sluggish job market have now collided to thwart economic growth both domestically and abroad.  He stated that The Dow Jones [industrial average] and virtually every other trading index around the world has been hammered in recent weeks. We know that Republican ideas of across the board deregulation got us in this mess and now the costs to the average family to buy a car or for a small business to expand have risen sharply.” 

He said he also believed that  Kansas families have been aware the United States is close to a full-blown recession for quite some time and have been demanding their elected representatives take action.  He went on to directly criticize the incumbent stating, “The failure of Rep. Moran and his own party to address the economic crisis which has been gathering over the past several years has had a significant impact on all working people of Kansas.  It also confirms his interests are not based on kitchen table economics but on holding court in Washington DC instead of helping middle class families trying to buy homes, build businesses, or survive tough times.”

In particular, Mr. Bordonaro criticized Mr. Moran’s statement by saying, “Jerry Moran laid out 3 provisions he believed would be helpful in resolving the credit crisis.  He wants the FDIC to increase its guarantees of personal bank accounts from $100,000 to $250,000; a change in the accounting procedure known as ‘mark to market’; and that the government should now guaranty loans between banks.  The first two proposals were already part of the bailout package he voted against and I can’t believe he is seriously proposing that the taxpayers get involved in risky loans between banks without adequate collateral.  What would the costs to the taxpayer have been if the government had guaranteed the loans of recently failed banks such  Indy Mac and Washington Mutual.” 

He went on to state, “Kansans need a careful and measured response to keep markets working and prevent the further unwinding in credit markets.”    I recognize that this Administration has little credibility left when it comes to understanding and dealing with the economic challenges of our times but if Jerry Moran doesn’t have faith in Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to carry out the bailout package he should just say so rather than put forth proposals that are already on the table.  Mr. Bordonaro said that he believed that voting no twice to the “emergency” plan after a year of bankruptcies and collapses was unacceptable and shortsighted.  “Mr. Moran was wrong to reject the compromise House plan, failed to create an alternative, and will seek to blame someone else for his party’s failed policies of the last  eight years.”  “I don’t blame him for voting against the Senate version because that bill was chock full of pork, but every member of Congress could see that once the House version failed the Senate was going to lard up its version with special interest tax breaks in order to ensure passage when the bill came up again in the House.  Now, we’ve got another $110 billion of additional spending which violates the Pay Go rules adding to the national debt and I don’t call that leadership.”  

Mr. Bordonaro went on to say that the government already had instituted a program to let banks use more of their illiquid assets as collateral to borrow federal money and that a better proposal would be further reductions in the Fed Funds rates which is the benchmark for overnight loans between banking institutions.  Asked about the potential for an increase in inflation in reducing short term interest rates, he stated that such a move would be a safer way to free up capital for banks to continue to lend in the near term and expressed more concerns about inflationary pressures from continued borrowing by the government to finance its budget deficit which is projected to reach $480 billion for the coming fiscal year which started October 1st.  Demonstrating his command of economic issues he stated, “Investors should closely watch the LIBOR [London Interbank Offered Rate] and the spread between U. S. Treasury notes to determine if the credit markets are easing in the wake of the passage of the bailout bill.”  He cautioned that in his opinion it will take several months before any actual illiquid securities are purchased by the government but that the markets had already largely priced the bailout bill into their forecasts and that future down turns in stocks, especially on the foreign exchanges, were indications of a general, worldwide, economic slow down coupled with a delayed reaction by European banking and real estate institutions to the problems in the American marketplace.  He pointed to the drop in wholesale oil prices as evidence that growth would become stagnant through at least the first two quarters of 2009, stating, “The oil markets are trading futures which look out about 6 months and are predictive of the perceived demand on a global basis which is closely tied to overall economic activity.”

Mr. Bordonaro said that he knows tough choices must be made and he will bring the creative ideas and leadership that are necessary. “One of the additional things Congress needs to do is to exercise oversight of the unregulated market in credit default swaps.  We’ve got trillions of dollars in notational value outstanding on corporate obligations with significantly less value and the third parties which are writing these securities have far too little capital to back them up.”  Another proposal which Mr. Bordonaro has endorsed is to permit bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of mortgages which he says is the best way to keep people in their homes.  “I only want to include protection for those individuals who actually reside in their homes not for those who gambled on ‘flipping houses’ to make a quick buck.”

Mr. Bordonaro stated that “more broadly, we’ve got to refocus our economy on creating high wage jobs in the renewable energy sector so we can get ourselves away from sending hundreds of billions of dollars to oil producing nations in the Middle East.  Having a steady income will permit people to pay down their mortgages and will reduced the number of bad loans on bank balance sheets thereby freeing up more lending.” 

Mr. Bordonaro concluded his remarks by stating he knows that the next Congress must act with speed and foresight to clean up what others leave behind.  He said, “It is time for people in high places to understand rejection first hand.  This election voters are free to choose between fear and negativity of Republicans or new ideas.  This November your clear choice will be between short-sighted representatives counting points in Washington instead of providing the economic foundation for the future of the Kansas economy and the nation as well.”

 

“Washington is Broken”

September 29th, 2008

That’s the assement of NBC reporter, Chuck Todd, in discussing the failure of leadership [specifically, Bush, McCain, Obama and the Congressional leadership of both parties]  by all sides in the Bailout mess.  It is clear that a new bipartisanship spirit is needed and most likely that will have to start at the top of the ticket and work its way down.  So Americans need to ask themselves not just which candidates will be better on foreign policy or the economy but also which candidates are willing to reach across the aisle and develop compromise and which candidates have the judgment to see beyond the surface issues and assess the potential outcomes of differing executive and legislative proposals. 

Throughout my campaign for Congress, some people have asked why I was running as  a Democrat in a district that was so overwhelmingly Republican.  As I have stated from the beginning, I wanted the voters to be presented with an option and that the health of our democracy depended on the full participation of the American people.  Ultimately, it is the people who will determine the direction we take on attempting to revive our economy and regardless of which position the voters of the Kansas First Congressional District  supported on this bailout proposal at least they will have the opportunity to hold their current representative, Jerry Moran, accountable at the ballot box.  Very telling will be which candidates actually took a position on the bill early on  and who sat on the sidelines and waited to see which way the political wind was blowing.  After I reviewed Sec. Paulson’s original, bare bones, 3 page proposal I came out against this bill more than a week ago on my blog Friday the 19th.  Jerry Moran hasn’t  even mentioned the bailout proposal on his campaign website!  http://www.moranforkansas.com/ 

John Boehner’s speech

September 29th, 2008

Minority Leader, John Boehner (R-OH) [pronounced Bay-Ner] came to the floor of the House of Representatives and delivered one of the better speeches of the morning.  He spoke with such emotion and conviction that it was very disappointing [from a leadership perspective as I still think the bill was a dressed-up turkey] to see that his caucus rejected his position by a 2 to 1 ratio.

[updated 10/7–I left the h out of the Congressman’s name in my first post]

Bailout Fallout

September 29th, 2008

I’m listening to Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL) who is on Fox-TV saying the bill failed because negotiations were damaged in the late stages by partisanship.  I guess that Bush’s calling in of Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain was not a good idea by allowing the injection of presidential politics.  Now, other Republicans are claiming that it was Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s speech on the floor of the House that was the real reason they couldn’t muster the votes.  Look, if any of the representatives are claiming they were swayed by a floor speech on one of the most important votes many will take in their entire careers (which was designed for public consumption–how often do you see an empty chamber on C-Span with one guy at the podium railing against Washington insiders) they are just shoveling steer excrement!

Watching the Bailout Vote As It Happens

September 29th, 2008

I write this post halfway through the 15 minutes alloted for the vote on the Wall Street Bailout Bill.  I have watched the speeches from the floor of the House of Representatives for most of the morning.  There have been persuasive arguments on both sides but what is becoming clear is that House Republicans have not supported the President despite the arm twisting of Vice President Chenney and Sen. John McCain earlier this week. 

It is asking an awful lot of House Democrats to support a bill which was originally put forth by an Administration that virtually all Democrats believe has neglected the concerns of Main Street and has time and time again proven to have had poor judgment, be it the illusory threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction or the failure to anticipate the effects of the housing market bubble’s burst.  If the majority of House Republicans are voting against a bill and then will hit their Democratic opponents over the head in the current election campaign cycle for voting for a measure that everyone in Congress agrees is disfavored by the American public and has generated more anger toward Washington than even the vote on invading Iraq, many Democrats will believe they have been led to the slaughterhouse and any future legislative cooperation for the upcoming Congress in January will be even more poisoned.    As I close this post the Dow Jones Average is down 494 points and time has officially expired on the vote which is tentatively gone down 228- 205 pending the vote being held open.   Heaven help us all.

Bombing in Pakistan

September 23rd, 2008

As most people are by now aware, the Marriot Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan was destroyed by a suicide truck bomber on Sunday.  As many as 53 people were killed and hundreds more wounded; many cut by shattered glass or burned by the large fire that broke out after the explosion.  I cannot condemn such outrageous actions strongly enough.  Responsibility for the attack points to supporters of the Afghanistan’s former rulers, the Taliban, who have fled the country and now reside among numerous tribes in the border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan.  Al Qaida also has support in this region which is very remote and difficult to control by the Pakistani government as many areas have previously been granted provisional autonomy. 

A couple of points are worth making at this stage.  First, it has been reported that the type of bomb was more sophisticated than past attacks, including the use of aluminum powder which is designed to burn at high temperatures and may have been the primary reason for the hotel catching fire so quickly rather than a rupture of a natural gas line within the hotel as had been initially reported.  If true, this would indicate a rapid increase in the technology with which The Taliban and Al Qaida are experimenting.  This could be an indication that future bomb attacks will be accompanied by other chemicals such as sulpher, magnesium or other chemicals to create a firestorm to take out neighborhoods or even possibly low-level radioactive materials which are designed to terrorize and disrupt normal businesses throughout an entire city. 

Second, criticism is appropriately leveled at security officials at the Marriot even absent hindsight.  According to videotape taken by the hotel’s security cameras of the truck ramming the front gate, several minutes passed after a small initial explosion (possibly the driver’s suicide vest or a hand-grenade) sparked a fire in the cab of the truck prior to the blast.  Local security guards are to be praised for attempting to put out the fire, however, apparently no one thought it might be a good idea to evacuate the hotel guest by the back door away from the truck. 

Finally, the larger point to be made is that this is another example of how the Bush Administration’s rush to war with Iraq took the focus off of capturing Osama Bin Laden and has led to a disregard of the importance of finishing the restructering of Afghanistan.  Even before the start of the war in Afghanistan, Bush had choosen to align himself with the military dictatorship of President Musharif rather than push for democracy and now with Musharif gone he has no basis for establishing goodwill with the new president, Zardari.  Bush has only antagonized the new government by ordering airstrikes on suspected militants but which often turn out to be civilians.  Just recently, the U.S. military denied it had killed as many as 90 civilians even after the Afghan government and the United Nations had issued reports to the contrary.  It wasn’t until video from a cell phone surfaced of the destroyed village that the U.S. agreed to reopen its investigation. Now, we hear reports that the Pakistani government is firing warning shots at American helicopters which have crossed over from bases in Afghanistan.  The next administration must establish a system of mutual respect and cooperation with the Pakistanis if it ever hopes to dislodge the Taliban and Al Qaida from the area around the border.  

Outrageous fraud at the Long Island Railroad

September 20th, 2008

The New York Times has broken a story detailing a systemic fraud on taxpayers by employees at all levels of the Long Island Railroad.  The Times reports that as many as 97% of retirees seek and most are approved for hundreds of thousands of dollars in disability payments.

Here’s a link:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/nyregion/21lirr.html?hp 

The Congress must put an immediate halt to this abuse.  While most of the money for the payments comes from taxes on the railroads, which are passed on to customers and riders, the Social Security Administration had to give the Railroad Retirement Fund 3.6 billion dollars last year to maintain solvency. 

The Board which reviews the disability payments has a near 100% approval rate.  The Board should be disbanded or reconstituted and all previous receipent’s claims must be reviewed on a case by case basis.

In previous candidate surveys, I have expressed support for alternate retirement systems for certain public employees such as railroad workers and police officers if it could be shown that workers received similar protections.  In light of this exposure of massive fraud, it may be prudent to review the entire railroad retirement system with an eye to ending the system and folding those retirees into the traditional Social Security program.   

Government’s Proposed Bailout of Wall Street

September 19th, 2008

RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNMENT’S BAILOUT PROPOSAL
 

This week the Secretary of Treasury, Hank Paulson, announced plans for the largest bailout of the financial sector in the history of the country.  While details of the full plan are still under development, the major component would be the establishment of a new government entity similar to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) which was created in the wake of the crisis in the Savings & Loan industry in the late 1980s.  This new entity will purchase bad or poorly performing debts of financial firms, primarily securities backed by bundles of subprime mortgage loans, of which a significant number of loans are in default. 

Secretary Paulson claims taking these so called “collateralized debt obligations” off the balance sheets of banks and investment brokerages will permit Wall Street analysts to properly evaluate the assets and liabilities of the companies thereby enabling the firms to continue to secure short term financing for day to day operations.  The Bush Administration has not provided a total price tag for the government’s bailout but said the figure would be in the “hundreds of billions of dollars” and entails significant risks to the Treasury and taxpayers.  The rational for the government’s intervention is that the risk of not providing a bailout outweighs the costs.  Supposedly, if more banks and brokerage firms were to fail, then the availability of credit for all sorts of consumer and business financing would dry up across the country. 

Let me be clear on this issue; I have not supported any of the previous bailouts for Bear Sterns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or A.I.G. and I cannot and will not support the current plan or any rescue plan which does not address the fundamental instability in the economy which has been caused by a decline in middle class incomes forcing many good families to default on their mortgages.  This decline is the result of higher prices for energy, food, gasoline, health care, basic insurance and high taxes at all levels of government.  Many Americans are being forced to pay to heat or cool their homes and purchase groceries by juggling credit cards from month to month while incurring exorbitant fees for late payments or balance transfers.   Any plan must also not reward those persons who speculated on the housing market in the hopes of “flipping” a property to make a quick buck. 

Furthermore, any government bailout must be accompanied by a specific proposal to pay for the costs rather than to simply add onto the nation’s debt which will result in the continuing devaluation of the American dollar against other currencies and force interest rates for qualified borrowers to climb through the roof. 

If elected, I promise a revamping of the tax code to grant tax relief to the middle and lower classes and pay for these tax cuts by refusing to extend the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 which are trickle-down economics at its worst.  The best way to keep home mortgages from going into foreclosure is to put people back to work so they can meet their payments on time.   Therefore, instead of a massive bailout which would primarily benefit Wall Street executives, I am proposing the creation of the 21st Century equivalent to Franklyn Roosevelt’s Works Progress Administration (WPA) to provide high paying jobs to expand renewable energy resources throughout the country to once and for all get us off our addiction to foreign oil and keep the hundreds of billions of dollars that we are paying at the pumps each year circulating within our own economy. 

In the short term, future banks and brokerage companies must be permitted to fail unless they can demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success with the addition of short term government loan guaranties which must be determined on a case by case basis.  Additionally, we must return to a regulatory environment which ensures that new loans are being made to individuals with solid credit and a demonstrated ability for repayment.  I would also seek to reform the bankruptcy rules which have swung too far in favor of the giant credit card issuers and which have led them to grant credit too freely. I would outlaw the practice of unfairly punishing consumers who make a single late payment on one credit card by jacking up the introductory, “teaser” rates on all their other credit cards.  Those families which are currently in the foreclosure process on their homesteads need to have the ability to seek alternate means of repayment in the bankruptcy courts as well.

These are just a few of the actions that need to be taken to rescue the American economy.  Enacting a very basic government sponsored health insurance program to contain rising medical costs associated with Emergency Room visits by those who lack a primary care physician and bringing a swift conclusion to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are also necessary to stem the tide of red ink which is drowning Washington, D. C. and placing the American Dream further beyond the reach of ordinary Americans.

Links To My Positions On Various Surveys

September 16th, 2008

I have been busy responding to a variety of surveys from state and national organizations.  I am attempting to provide links to the surveys as they are posted on the groups’ websites so that the voters can have the answers compiled all in one place.

 

I have completed a survey for AARP (American Association of Retired Persons).  However, AARP’s spokesperson has indicated they may not release the results of candidate surveys to the public at this time.  Please go to www.aarp.org for further information.

Here’s a link to one healthcare organization’s survey:  http://www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.org/profile.php?c_id=MTQ1OTcy

Here’s the link to ArmenPac which focuses on issues related to Armenia.

http://www.armenpac.org/survey08/response.php?cid=H8KS01027

My Differences with the Presidential Candidates on Education

August 2nd, 2008

Both John McCain and Barack Obama have recently been speaking about their approaches to education.  I differ with each of the candidates who have taken a broad view of federal involvement in local education. 

Sen. Obama touts that he would pay teachers more.  Yes, everybody agrees that teachers are underpaid for the amount of work they are required to perform.  In our capitalist society we often see examples where poor results happen when we try to apply the laws of supply and demand to intangible goals like producing quality education for all.  But, where will the money come from for Sen. Obama’s plan?  Will it be from the general revenues of the federal government or will it be another unfunded mandate on the states? Is this a situation where the federal government will, in effect, be telling states and local school boards that it knows better than they do on how to allocate finances among the other competing areas of education, such as maintenance and capital improvements?

Sen. McCain, in a speech yesteday to the National Urban League’s annual convention, said that he wanted to increase the supply of teachers by encourage states to adopt measures that would let persons with business or technical skills teach in the classroom by having alternate licensure.  He actually even used “air quotes” (pun intended) when suggesting that such licensees should not be required to have taken coursework in areas like methodology.  Sen. McCain’s goal is admirable, and at least he doesn’t suggest, at this point, that he would impose requirements on the states by tying federal money to States to mandate such legislation (like NCLB), however, many states already have such alternative certification procedures in place.  Furthermore, is it really so burdensome on people who want to leave industry to teach in the schools to require that they know something about how children learn at various ages or how to control classroom behavior.  I would argue that a school system which doesn’t insist that a new teacher have coursework or internship experience in these areas is setting the teacher up to fail and will ultimately discourage professionals from wanting to be involved in teaching.